Well, I saw the wand of the noble collection and as everybody can see, there are some Death Eater wands who are named after the form they look like (snake, dark mark, skull, stallion thorn). R a t n e e r Owl Me! 22:27, Janu(UTC) Thorfinn Rowle's wand Seth Cooper owl post! 22:25, Janu(UTC) That sounds about right Seth. Maybe the lowest "tier 2" or highest "tier 3". R a t n e e r Owl Me! 20:05, Janu(UTC) As they are replicas of the film's props, I would say they are less canonical as the actual film props, but more canonical than the games. Therefore, In my opinion, As long as it doesn't contradict other canon, it should be considered canon. ![]() (However, the article doesn't cite a source for that, so I'm going to see if I can find a reference on Google.) - Nick O'Demus 19:19, Janu(UTC) Well, I would say since, that Noble collections, like the video games, have license from Rowling, that they are canon after the games. The article on Minerva McGonagall's wand says it was 17" in the film, but the Noble website says 16". These things are judged on a case by case basis, so I don't see why these wands should be any different. Yes, some of them contradict canon, but so do inumerable other things from the movies. The Noble collections are exact replicas of the wands used in the movies, which are second tier canon. It's not possibly as it's Ron's second one ( Prisoner of Azkaban onwards). I don't feel this can be considered a reliable source for this information with that track record. That's one match ( possibly) and five direct contradictions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |